The adoption of technological resources in the Brazilian electoral system is nothing new. Since 1996, when the first electronic voting machines were used, still in the testing phase, the country has been continually investing in improving the process.
In the 2000s, electronic voting was introduced throughout the country and represented a great achievement for the country, especially because it allowed Brazil to get ahead of major technological powers, such as the United States , which still uses paper ballots in most of its states to this day.
Electronic ballot box vs. printed vote
The adoption of electronic voting machines can be considered the first step towards placing the Brazilian electoral system in the spotlight on the world stage , which has also gained notoriety for the speed of vote uruguay mobile database counting and the security and accuracy of the information collected. This is because the electronic voting system almost always allows results to be obtained on the same day that the elections are held and because there has never been any evidence of fraud since its use began.
These are some of the reasons why ballot boxes offer advantages over printed ballots. In addition to the fact that the vote count is done manually and slowly, resulting in delays in the publication of results, and a greater possibility of fraud at all stages, from collection to counting, printed ballots also represent a setback for the electoral system by denying technological advances. More than that, printed ballots also bring a much higher cost to elections – estimated at R$2.5 billion to the public coffers over the next ten years, according to projections by the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) – without guaranteeing security.
In contrast, the electronic ballot box relies on a system developed exclusively by the TSE, without access to the internet, Bluetooth or any other computer network, which means that it operates independently, completely isolated, precisely to prevent any type of attack on the information computed.
In addition, the ballot boxes have encrypted vote records to ensure that the content is not modified or to prevent errors in recording or reading the content. Encryption makes it impossible to identify who voted for whom, thus preserving the secrecy required in the electoral process.