Erdogan was therefore able to demand punishment in two ways - as a person and as a statesman. this special rule for "majesties" by means of a bill, but until then it is in force and therefore applicable. Instead of adequately explaining such contexts, several journalists constructed a connection with media freedom, which does not actually lebanon rcs data exist: media freedom never includes a claim or the right to insult people at will, and media freedom never and nowhere guarantees the media a lawless space. This must also be made clear.
Moreover, the debate should trigger a spring cleaning of criminal law not only in Germany but also in Switzerland and abolish the similarly dusty Article 296, on the basis of which the Federal Council had in the past enabled foreign dictators who felt insulted to have their critics punished in Switzerland by the Federal Court.
ZDF would do well to finally return the entire report to the media library. Such an act is not a statement on the quality of the report, but a commitment to a responsible audience, which, as a public broadcaster with an educational mission, should be enabled to participate in a discourse in an informed manner and to form their own opinions. This is difficult to achieve if you are dependent on third-party accounts or can only find the transcribed text online or have to play cat and mouse on the Internet to see the entire report. Satire is also justified by the fact that the audience recognizes the exaggeration, and that is precisely what is only possible if you see the report as a whole. The vehement debate has made it a document of contemporary history.