This is what we call a transparency offensive these days. SRF gives the audience the opportunity to act as a member of the editorial team, producer or presenter (persoenlich.com reported) . It is called "audience employees" and the whole idea is as horrific as the use of the present participle to describe employees in a supposedly gender-neutral and therefore non-discriminatory way.
The term "reader reporter" has long been accepted, although surprisingly the version "reader reporter" has been avoided. What this means is that anyone (and of course women) can send an brazil rcs data observation, a photo, a video to media outlets, which will be rewarded if used. Nothing against tips from the audience. But actually every reporter, every photographer and every cameraman should expressly forbid this. Either there is training, qualifications, professionalism behind it - or journalism becomes a do-it-yourself thing and proves, even if it is not necessary, that actually everyone can sort a few letters or press a button.
In principle, there is nothing wrong with the patient looking over the doctor's shoulder (when he is not lying on the examination table), the house builder staring at the architect's screen while he is planning in CAD, or admiring the florist as she makes a bouquet. But no one would think of offering the public the opportunity to try out the device themselves, because that would be an incredible boost to transparency.