Comparing data to uranium is an accurate analogy. Uranium is radioactive and it is imperative to handle it carefully to avoid radiation exposure, the effects of which are linked to serious health and safety concerns. Issues with the deployment of uranium, such as in reactors, for instance, can lead to radioactive fallouts that are expensive to contain and have europe rcs data long-term health consequences for impacted individuals. The possibility of uranium being stolen poses significant risks and global repercussions.
Data exhibits similar characteristics. It is critical for it to be stored safely, and those who experience data theft are forced to deal with long-term consequences – identity theft and financial concerns, for example. An organization experiencing a cyberattack must deal with regulatory oversight and fines. In some cases, losing sensitive data can trigger significant global consequences.
Several recommended best practices are designed to help avoid these scenarios. For example, companies sometimes store unnecessary data that is irrelevant to their business and operations. For instance, the average retailer doesn’t need a customer’s home address or date of birth. When a breach occurs, there is higher exposure due to the theft of data that the company shouldn’t have had in the first place.