Goal No. 17 of the UN Migration Pact states that countries commit to promoting a public discourse that leads to a more humane and constructive perception of migration and migrants.
What does that mean? Will the media now have to ignore or gloss over negative incidents on migration issues, as is common practice in propaganda? Can journalists be forced to control public perception? If the south korea rcs data UN migration pact requires the media to promote the image of a group, where does that leave independence?
If, for example, the army were to demand that the media be punished if journalists wrote too critically about national defense, there would certainly be an outcry. Advocacy journalism is frowned upon. The media are obliged to provide accurate information. But they also have an important control function. Things would get bad if they could now be disciplined and controlled through subsidies. There is already a legal framework in place, such as at SRF. There, all programs must respect human dignity. There is therefore no need for any additional restrictions.