The business process should not contain anything superfluous, a

[jarinislamfatema]

It is guaranteed to lead to the set goal. That's all. Considering it from the point of view of some "value" is pointless. Myth 3. When analyzing, you should always have As Is (As it is) This is often written about in textbooks, including foreign ones. They describe the sequence of actions: first you need to get As Is (How it is), then move on to To Be (How it should be). There is nothing wrong with this approach, but only if you come to a company that already has some kind of its own "as is".

That is, the textbooks describe a situation where taiwan whatsapp number data a business consultant comes to a company where there is already some kind of system, people work according to certain principles. He needs to figure out what is going on, after which he can offer something better. But in reality, especially in the context of Russian business, very often the As Is system simply does not exist. There are departments, for example, the sales department. Each manager works in their own way. Often there is not even a single database of leads or contracts "in progress".

In this case, you can, of course, do "As Is" for each employee individually or for those who were interviewed. But if there is no single documentation, no single instructions, what is the point? Therefore, quite often there is no need to make “As Is” notations. If there is no unified system, what is the point of analyzing what is happening? You will understand this anyway, at the stage of interviewing employees. There is no system. People understand this perfectly well. They do not need to be explained that everything is working incorrectly and unsystematically.