An instrument that records what has been agreed upon

[mahbubamim077]

It is enough to remember that the same provision provides that, in relationships between themselves, the partners are also obliged to prove the existence of the company in writing. It is clear that, for the smooth running of the relationships between the partners, as well as the preservation of the legitimate interests and rights of all, it is recommended, whenever the company is contracted, to do so in writing, strictly complying with the command of Article 987 of the Civil Code.

The culture of inconsequential understanding of the formative period of society bulk sms vietnam takes precedence over the law. Lawyers should influence a change in this scenario: demonstrate how the use of legal technology has greater importance and strength for the success of business initiatives, especially in establishing a legal quality of the relationship and its effects and preventing conflicts and losses. There is a need to call for greater legal care, the need for adequate professional support from qualified lawyers, allowing for correct diagnoses of the challenges presented and the prescription of adequate contractual tools. All of this is essential for a satisfactory outcome.

Finally, since we mentioned the outcome earlier, the Civil Code is silent on the hypothesis of failure of a joint venture to become a personified company. In other words, there is no express and specific rule that regulates the dissolution of a joint venture due to withdrawal from forming a contractual partnership. Anyone who has experienced such a process knows how chaotic it is. In truth, such lawsuits are the result of legal errors by lawyers and recklessness by businesspeople: not giving importance to the formative period, failing to employ good legal technology to provide security and regularity, preventing it from devolving into a free-for-all if something goes wrong.