Some experts believe that fairly thorough monitoring
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 3:41 am
In short, Alexander Ruzanov's opinion is as follows: ) The rapid emergence of social networks and the involvement of ever-increasing masses of people in them began around - (the launch of Facebook, etc. Since then, more and more people have been spending more and more time on social networks, replacing real interaction with people in the real world. In addition, large groups of people have formed in social networks who make business on this. ) Therefore, social networks (including TikTok) have become part of the social space, a way of communication and a way of life.
This is living tissue. Banning any of the social networks will be a kind of painful surgery to remove harmful tissue along with a useful part of the body. That is, a ban on social networks is justified only in the case of direct threats to national security or public safety. Accordingly, such a decision should be carefully weighed, based on research, expertise and analysis of possible oman email list consequences. ) Surveys of experts on the influence of social networks on society demonstrate the dual nature of such influence. However, many experts believe that the destructive influence of social networks exceeds the benefits of their use.
However, experts are against direct and total bans of social networks. of content in social networks is needed, identifying and blocking destructive content, and holding the authors and participants in the distribution of harmful, destructive content accountable. Other experts are inclined to believe that the state should focus its efforts on educational work with the population, and especially with children and young people, teaching the hygiene of using social networks, teaching how to distinguish truth from fakes, resisting manipulation and fraud on networks, and so on. In our opinion, one should be complemented by the other.
This is living tissue. Banning any of the social networks will be a kind of painful surgery to remove harmful tissue along with a useful part of the body. That is, a ban on social networks is justified only in the case of direct threats to national security or public safety. Accordingly, such a decision should be carefully weighed, based on research, expertise and analysis of possible oman email list consequences. ) Surveys of experts on the influence of social networks on society demonstrate the dual nature of such influence. However, many experts believe that the destructive influence of social networks exceeds the benefits of their use.
However, experts are against direct and total bans of social networks. of content in social networks is needed, identifying and blocking destructive content, and holding the authors and participants in the distribution of harmful, destructive content accountable. Other experts are inclined to believe that the state should focus its efforts on educational work with the population, and especially with children and young people, teaching the hygiene of using social networks, teaching how to distinguish truth from fakes, resisting manipulation and fraud on networks, and so on. In our opinion, one should be complemented by the other.