Page 1 of 1

Browser browsing history

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:11 am
by rakhirhif8963
The protection of information using passwords is also questionable. "All passwords should be stored hashed in MD5" is a classic call from information security experts. But, unfortunately, it has long since lost its relevance. The so-called "rainbow tables" - a tool for cracking hashes - are now available to anyone who types this word into a search engine. By comparing the original string and its hash, they make it easy to reverse any "irreversible" hash function. Modern rainbow tables store every word ever encountered on forums, Wikipedia and the Internet in general, as well as all its forms. In 2012, Poul-Henning Kamp, one of the FreeBSD developers, called for a complete abandonment of the md5crypt algorithm he created, as it does not provide a noticeable increase in the hash calculation time in modern conditions, and therefore does not protect against a complete enumeration.

The cached browsing history of websites can tell a lot nepal whatsapp data a person, so it is not surprising that advertising companies and intermediaries hunt for it. There have been precedents when they managed to get it. For example, in 2016, a journalist from the German public radio and television channel Norddeutscher Rundfunk (NDR) and a researcher hired by him proved that the popular extension for assessing the reliability of visited websites Web of Trust collected the browsing history of 3 million of its clients.

Although the addon developers claimed to protect the anonymity of their users, in reality it turned out that their identities were easy to establish, since URLs often contain user names, email addresses, full names, etc. Researchers reported that they were able to easily identify 50 people from the control sample, and in the user history they were able to find data on police investigations, learn the sexual preferences of a judge, closed financial data of commercial companies, find users who were looking for drugs, prostitutes, etc. Despite the fact that the Web of Trust developers sold the information anonymously, there were still interested parties.