This is the biggest problem

[kexej28769@nongnue]

Disclaimer! The majority of sites don't need to disavow *anything*.
Now I want to start with a big announcement. I want this to be approved by a Google spokesperson. So the big disclaimer is that the vast majority of sites don't need to disavow anything. Google has made great strides in the last few years in determining which links to simply ignore. In fact, this آخری کے بڑے پوائنٹس میں سے ایک تھا۔Penguin 4.0 algorithm update .

Before Penguin, you had to disavow links all the time. But after Penguin 4.0, Google started ignoring most bad links , emphasis on the word “most.” It’s not a perfect system. They don’t ignore all belgium number data links. We’ll come back to that point in a minute. There’s a risk in using the Disavow Tool to disavow good links.

I see with people who use disavow, it's really hard to determine what Google considers a bad link or a harmful link and what they consider a good link. So a lot of people over-disavow and disavow a lot of things. So this is something you need to look out for. My last point in the disclaimer is big, healthy sites with good link profiles are safer than bad links.

So if you're the New York Times or Wikipedia and you have a few spammy links pointing to you, it's not really going to hurt you. But if your link profile isn't healthy, that's something you need to consider. So with those disclaimers out of the way, let's talk about the opposite type of situation, the situations where you might want to consider using the Disavow tool.

Good candidates for using the Disavow tool
Obviously, if you have a manual penalty. Now, they've decreased significantly since Penguin 4.0. But they're still there. People still get manual penalties. Sure, that's what the Disavow Tool is for. But there are other situations.