Sergey Polovnikov, head of the information and analytical
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:10 am
This was discussed at the international forum on professional networks and communication systemsProfComm-2023, organized by the ComNews Information Group, reported the director of the mobile communications research center of the Federal State Budgetary Institution "Radio Research Institute" Sergey Tynyankin. He said that the new standard is the result of reworking the basic requirements that are laid down in the DMR standard.
"The main objective of the new standards is to ensure Russia's technological sovereignty in the field of professional mobile radio communications (PMR) by switching to unified domestic equipment. The first standard will reduce the overall position of the system, the second - subscriber station communication via a r latvia whatsapp number database epeater, the third standard - trunk mode of subscriber station communication. In 2024, we will organize work on their approval. And by the end of 2024, I hope, they will come into force," Sergei Tynyankin specified.
He also added that from 2025 the state will approve a plan for the transition to a single national radio communications platform. A two-year period is expected, when foreign and domestic communications systems will operate in parallel. "According to the plan, by 2029 all state and commercial manufacturers must switch to using the Russian PPR platform based on domestic standards," said Sergey Tynyankin.
agency Content Review, was skeptical about the emergence of new standards: "It is not enough to adopt a standard. It will only work if it is supported by a large number of equipment manufacturers. And if there is no high-quality and cheap equipment for the standard, then it can lie under the rug for as long as necessary. A striking example of this is the Internet of Things standard, which was once adopted by the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media. No one has used it, does not use it, and will never use it. Therefore, the adoption of a standard, by and large, does not mean anything. The only chance for the future is the availability of equipment and its low price, then it will work."
TelecomDaily CEO Denis Kuskov believes that work on standards depends on the readiness of equipment manufacturers: "Everything will depend on whether our manufacturers will be able to assemble equipment in 2025 and in what quantity. If it is calculated in thousands, then these are "pennies" that will lead to nothing. In normal times, Russian operators installed from 70 thousand to 100 thousand base stations, depending on the calculation method (the Ministry of Digital Development and Roskomnadzor calculate differently). But the figures are approximately like this. It must be understood that the Russian market requires 100 thousand base stations per year. Whether we will be able to produce that much is unknown. But producing base stations only for the Russian market is a utopia. They need to be produced for more countries, at least for the BRICS countries. Then this issue will concern reducing the cost of equipment. In general, a national system is great, but as long as 70-80% of its components are imported, there is no point in this system No. It all depends on how prepared the producers are by 2025."
Leading analyst of Mobile Research Group Eldar Murtazin is sure that the standards will not work because of their recommendatory nature: "There is a very simple reason. You can take, for example, Chinese radio stations, re-design them and use them. Until we protect our market and demand compliance with standards, certification in laboratories, nothing will change. There are many questions about how we want to form communications. In my opinion, we need to focus on the domestic standard, introduce it gently, make a transition period for the equipment so that not only Russian companies, but also foreign ones can adjust and adapt so that the work is gradual. This will allow us not to lose competition in the market, maintain it and open the market for foreign companies. I do not see a problem in foreign technologies. In any case, we depend on the element base and many developments. We need not just to coexist, but to outline a roadmap in which we will take the best of both worlds - support our standard, develop it and at the same time not push away companies from friendly countries. Let them contribute to our economy."
"The main objective of the new standards is to ensure Russia's technological sovereignty in the field of professional mobile radio communications (PMR) by switching to unified domestic equipment. The first standard will reduce the overall position of the system, the second - subscriber station communication via a r latvia whatsapp number database epeater, the third standard - trunk mode of subscriber station communication. In 2024, we will organize work on their approval. And by the end of 2024, I hope, they will come into force," Sergei Tynyankin specified.
He also added that from 2025 the state will approve a plan for the transition to a single national radio communications platform. A two-year period is expected, when foreign and domestic communications systems will operate in parallel. "According to the plan, by 2029 all state and commercial manufacturers must switch to using the Russian PPR platform based on domestic standards," said Sergey Tynyankin.
agency Content Review, was skeptical about the emergence of new standards: "It is not enough to adopt a standard. It will only work if it is supported by a large number of equipment manufacturers. And if there is no high-quality and cheap equipment for the standard, then it can lie under the rug for as long as necessary. A striking example of this is the Internet of Things standard, which was once adopted by the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media. No one has used it, does not use it, and will never use it. Therefore, the adoption of a standard, by and large, does not mean anything. The only chance for the future is the availability of equipment and its low price, then it will work."
TelecomDaily CEO Denis Kuskov believes that work on standards depends on the readiness of equipment manufacturers: "Everything will depend on whether our manufacturers will be able to assemble equipment in 2025 and in what quantity. If it is calculated in thousands, then these are "pennies" that will lead to nothing. In normal times, Russian operators installed from 70 thousand to 100 thousand base stations, depending on the calculation method (the Ministry of Digital Development and Roskomnadzor calculate differently). But the figures are approximately like this. It must be understood that the Russian market requires 100 thousand base stations per year. Whether we will be able to produce that much is unknown. But producing base stations only for the Russian market is a utopia. They need to be produced for more countries, at least for the BRICS countries. Then this issue will concern reducing the cost of equipment. In general, a national system is great, but as long as 70-80% of its components are imported, there is no point in this system No. It all depends on how prepared the producers are by 2025."
Leading analyst of Mobile Research Group Eldar Murtazin is sure that the standards will not work because of their recommendatory nature: "There is a very simple reason. You can take, for example, Chinese radio stations, re-design them and use them. Until we protect our market and demand compliance with standards, certification in laboratories, nothing will change. There are many questions about how we want to form communications. In my opinion, we need to focus on the domestic standard, introduce it gently, make a transition period for the equipment so that not only Russian companies, but also foreign ones can adjust and adapt so that the work is gradual. This will allow us not to lose competition in the market, maintain it and open the market for foreign companies. I do not see a problem in foreign technologies. In any case, we depend on the element base and many developments. We need not just to coexist, but to outline a roadmap in which we will take the best of both worlds - support our standard, develop it and at the same time not push away companies from friendly countries. Let them contribute to our economy."